Fuji x-pro 1

[allxages]

źródło

[marszull]

dzieki

[rainbow_jeremy]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-l9QZS8P9M

Taki se review. Niestety wynika stąd, że z AFem nie najlepiej.

[sv]

http://www.f8photography.com.hk/blog...firstthoughts/

[Piotr_0602]

Which camera - Xpro1 vs. OM-D:

http://www.sansmirror.com/newsviews/which-camera.html


"Fujifilm X-Pro1 or Olympus E-M5? Still a little early to call, but initial impressions say E-M5 hands down. The X-Pro1 is a big camera, as big as a Leica M9. It has a limited (and expensive) lens set. It has poor autofocus performance. It has a large, eccentric sensor (APS, non-Bayer). It has a retro design with a hybrid optical/EVF viewfinder. The E-M5 is a smaller camera than it looks in photos. It has an extensive lens set. It has faster focus performance. It has the best of the m4/3 sensors so far. It has a very usable EVF. The problem I have with the Fujifilm is that it is really only great for one (slow) style of shooting, and it's doesn't take advantage of the size benefit that removing the mirror gives you. The hybrid viewfinder is fine, but it's a bit of a gimmick. A good EVF is enough, which is exactly what the E-M5 has. Bottom line: for less money you get a smaller camera that has a huge lens arsenal and very good autofocus performance. "

[arra]

Tak jak się spodziewałem, najlepsza matryca APSC sądząc po samplach. Genialne odwzorowanie kolorów. Gdyby nie ta cena :/
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/04...st-impressions

[Piotr_0602]

Gdyby nie ta cena i gdyby nie ten AF:

"For all of the comparisons to the ultra-expensive Leica M9, it's important to remember that the X-Pro1 has other competitors as well. Realistically, anyone interested in the X-Pro1 will also be considering standout mirrorless models like the Sony NEX 7 and Olympus OM-D E-M5. Be warned though - if you're excited by the very fast autofocus performance of these cameras, you might be disappointed by the responsiveness of the X-Pro1.

In reasonably well-lit scenes with subjects of moderate contrast, AF acquisition is certainly adequate, although no-one will ever mistake the X-Pro1 for an action or sports-oriented camera. The real frustration comes in lower light scenes when using the 60mm f/2.4. Focus hunting is a constant problem, with performance that is noticeably slower than either of the other two XF lenses. I must say though, that while AF may be slow, when the X Pro1 finds its mark it is very, very accurate. After reviewing hundreds of my handheld sample images on the computer, I've only been able to identify a small handful that are unusable due to mis-focus by the AF system."

Świetne zdjęcia, ale aparat do statycznej fotografii, gdzie szybkość AF nie ma znaczenia.

[szwayko]

Niektóre osoby myślały o ślubach i innych reporterkach tym aparatem. Ale nie zastąpi on lustrzanki pod względem AF, ani Leici pod względem MF. Ot taki gadżet. Cóż z tego że matryca super jak obrazek to zwykły crop APSC. W tej cenie już wolałbym w środku starą matrycę od pierwszego 5D z max ISO 1600. Przynajmniej po podpięciu manualnych Voigtländerów czy Leica-M miałbym ładny obrazek.

[rog]

Szkoda, że do Bessy nikt nie włoży matrycy. ;P

[Tornvald]

Epson swego czasu wlozyl...

Wysłano z GT-I9000 z użyciem Tapatalk