System Micro Four Thirds

[Piotr_0602]

Dobrze że w systemie jest wybór, i jak ktoś chce może używać bezkompromistowych ale drogich Leica-Panasoniców - 25/1.4 czy 42,5/1.2, ale ma też do wyboru mniejsze, lżejsze i dużo tańsze (a optycznie niekoniecznie gorsze) i nieco ciemniejsze Olki - 25/1.8 (za chwilę wchodzi na rynek) i 45/1.8. Jedne pasuja do body typu EM-1 czy GH3, a drugie do mniejszych PENów czy maleńkiego GM1.


Z innej beczki - obszerny test EM-1:

Olympus OMD EM1 review | Cameralabs

W tym porównanie do EM-5 i FF-owych bezlusterkowców Sony:

Olympus OMD EM1 vs EM5 vs GX7 vs Sony A7 | Cameralabs

Ogólnie ocenili EM-1 świetnie:

"As a semi-pro option I'd say the OMD EM1 is a triumph. It has a tough weatherproof body that handles like a dream, feeling great in your hands with highly customizable but always intuitive and comfortable controls, sports one of the best electronic viewfinders around that actually delivers a slightly bigger view than a full-frame DSLR, boasts highly effective built-in stabilisation which works with any lens you attach, enjoys fast single AF speeds and can rattle-off bursts at 10fps. On top of this you get built-in Wifi with great smartphone remote control, focus peaking, a 1/8000 shutter and an enhanced version of Olympus's Live Time / Live Bulb mode which lets you peek at long exposures as they build-up, reminiscent of developing a black and white print in a darkroom."


choć niekoniecznie warto wymieniać EM-5 na EM-1, bo pod pewnym względami EM-5 może nawet lepiej pasować (przede wszystkim będzie odczuwalnie mniejszy):

"Should existing EM5 owners upgrade? That's a tricky one to weigh-up. In my tests the EM1 didn't deliver superior image quality, and again in terms of shooting long exposures without noise reduction, was actually worse. The phase detect AF points certainly help if you're using older Four Thirds lenses, but if you shoot with native Micro Four Thirds lenses the EM1's AF is barely better than the EM5. Despite claims by Olympus I also found the built-in stabilisation was roughly similar on both models. So I wouldn’t upgrade if you're looking for better quality, AF or stabilisation."
(EM-5 powinien być teraz dobrą opcją - dostajemy niewiele mniej niż w EM-1 za dużo mniejszą cenę)


bezlusterkowce FF-owe od Sony mają oczywiście większą matrycę, co da mniejsze szumy i więcej Mpix-eli, ale pod wieloma względami EM-1 nad nimi góruje, tak że autor recenzji preferuje EM-1:

"For me the combination of quicker handling, built-in stabilisation and plenty of native lenses makes the EM1 a better all-round camera for most people, and while the sensor is lower resolution and four times smaller, the detail is still enough for most purposes and the size allows high quality small lenses to be made which are sharp into the corners. The EM1 also works out considerably cheaper if you factor-in buying some native lenses too - the Zeiss primes for the Sony are very nice, but not cheap."
(a wybór szkieł do obu systemów jest nieporównywalny)