Dokładnie o tym samym myślę, plus BSI w Canona nazwane HS (nowy Ixy 300HS).Zamieszczone przez psl
Tylko odrobić lekcje z NEX'a i NX10:
1. Complicated and fiddly menu system teamed with very little external controls
2. A dust reduction system that doesn't work nearly as good as the competition (not good for such a exposed sensor)- Quoted from Imaging Resource Review "We have found, however, that in-camera dust-removal systems are less than perfectly effective. You're still going to need to use a sensor-cleaning kit fairly often, so the advantage of in-body dust removal is perhaps less than it might seem. If you've got dust specks on your sensor (and sooner or later you will), you're going to need to clean it." Ouch!
3. Big lenses, sans 16mm prime
4. Prime 16mm no stabilization, too wide for portraits, not a good street shooting focal length, horrible close focus distance, and lots of CA and soft corners. Sigh.
5. NO ISO 100 (again, wow, still haven't learned eh?)
6. NO Noise Reduction off setting (strong or weak).. still haven't learned
7. High price as a kit
8. Auto ISO only goes up to 1600? (per spec sheet on IR)
http://www.alphamountworld.com/forum...es/2010-5/5731
i Panasonika GF1
http://43rumors.com/panasonic-gf1-vs...us-speed-test/
Poza tym na IR są tabelki z lagiem migawki: nie pamiętam dokładnie czasów GF1, ale Sony chyba troszku wolniejsze.
Najważniejsza lekcja: nie przenoście nam stolicy do Krakowa
zamiast zakresu 28-88 dajcie 24-90 jako standard. Kit z natury zawsze jest ciemny więc da radę.
Do tego 24/2.0, 50/1.4, 90-100/2.0 lub 2.8 IS
