Jeszcze jeden post, ktory ma sens:
"The two most credible sources are saying:
- Source 1 - Canon underestimated the drop in the demand for the 30D and has significant stocks, so that they made a late decision to defer the 40D, drop the price of the 30D and market it strongly (lens packages, D80 like pricing in some markets etc). They now intend to have 4 DSLR announcements in the year of the EOS 20th anniversary ? beginning March 2007 and ending February 2008. The 1D III (done), the 40D (mid year), the 1Ds III (August / September 2007) and the 5D replacement
- Source 2 - Canon had the 40D ready to go and ran the specifications (10.4mp 1.6 crop, Digic III, Antidust etc) past some very influential buyer reps and got the feedback that this would be a ?me too? camera, seen as a catch-up to the competition with nothing much to differentiate it. This was not acceptable to Canon in the 20th anniversary year, where Canon?s DSLRs needed to be seen as defining the market. So they have sent the camera back for some specification updates and plan a release later this year. Updates being considered included 3 inch LCD, limited weather sealing, Wi Fi attachment option (as per the 1D III) and the next generation 12mp sensor. They may even surprise people by skipping the 40D name (e.g. 50D or 60D to make a point)."
Dla dopelnienia, z tego samego zrodla, sytuacja na froncie 1Ds MkIII:
Canon were testing a FF sensor last year with the same 6.4 x 6.4 pixel pitch as the 30D but with larger photodiodes and better pixel lenses. Compared to the current 1Ds II’s 7.2 x 7.2 sensors this gave a pixel density increase of 1.266 (my calculation) giving a sensor size of 21.8mp with an effective size of 21mp. This sensor also had a built in 1.255 crop mode, giving a 16.7mp 1D IIn equivalent picture. The sensor (with dual DIGIC III etc) could do 5 FPS at FF and 8 FPS in crop mode…. The photodiodes were approximately the same size as those in the 1Ds II’s 7.2 x 7.2 pixels and with the next generation noise reduction etc this sensor delivered 3200 ISO native and 6400 with High mode enabled…
And (surprise ) they were also testing a FF 16.6mp sensor with the 7.2 x 7.2 pixel size, new micro lenses and close to 5D sized photodiodes (presumably for the new high end 5D replacement). What is interesting is if you reverse the maths, for the 1.255 crop this gives you exactly the 1d III sensor when cut down from FF…. Which makes a lot of sense
Now what remains to be seen is what Canon actually release… But if I were a betting man it will be damm close to the above (ie IDs III with 21mp and the 3D or 5D Mark II with 16.7mp)
Oh and BTW the testers LOVED the image quality on both cameras…
Odpowiedz z cytatem
Zamieszczone przez arturs
Przeciez ten co mam teraz to juz ma pare miesiecy i moralnie sie zestarzal. Niby zdjecia robi ale nie maca sie go tak fajnie jak pare miechow temu. Trza by bylo cos nowego zanabyc... 
Nie chcesz, nie czytaj, that simple...