Procesor z rodziny DIGIC 6 plus akumulator LP-E6N to nie jest najszczęśliwsza kombinacja.
Okay, I can confirm there is indeed some level of battery drain on the 5DIV. I had placed a fully charged LP-E6N in my 5DIV two days ago, took one shot, put it away. Today I checked it and it's down to 90%. GPS and Wifi both OFF.5DIV battery drain: brand new LP-E6N lost 10% in two days with the camera off.Just an update; The battery is now down to 85%. 5 days, 15% drop.
5DIII with a 4 year old LP-E6 had only 4% drain in over 10 days.By comparison, I put a fully charged, 4 year old LP-E6 in my 5DIII over 10 days ago. Without touching it, the 5DIII is still at 96%.
Źródło:
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/58449045
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/58468840
Wygląda na to iż jak na razie nie ma problemów z procesorem DIGIC 7 zamontowanym w EOS 6D Mark II.
Źródło: https://dustinabbott.net/2017/09/can...ark-ii-review/Battery Life
Like other recent Canon camera releases, the 6D2 utilizes the LP-E6N battery, though it is "backwards-compatible" with the older LP-E6 batteries used by many of Canon's last generation DSLRs. You might get marginally better focus speed or battery life with the newer batteries, but in many situations you won't notice the difference. What's interesting is that the 6D2 has many of the same "pieces" as the 5D Mark IV (GPS, touchscreen, processor, etc...), but the 5D Mark IV flies through batteries by comparison. The rating differs by 300 shots (900 for the 5D Mark IV, 1200 for the 6DII). Real world shooting seems even greater, however, with the battery life indicator scarcely budging on the 6DII. After several weeks of review, I've not yet had to recharge the battery, which simply wasn't the case with the 5D Mark IV. Battery life is a definite plus with the 6D Mark II. In real world use it seems to me that the battery life is near twice that of the 5D Mark IV, which can be guilty of underperforming its specifications while the 6D2 seems to outperform them. This is definitely a solid plus for the 6D2.